Code Review — AI Code Review & Bug Hunting | NetRoom

Code Review

Code — code review, bug & security hunting

Free · included with account

What it does

Assistant strengths

  • Critical bugs and security risks first, everything else after
  • Knows the common OWASP Top 10 holes and checks authorization and secrets
  • Catches bottlenecks: redundant database calls, N+1, leaky abstractions
  • Cites the exact lines and tags findings by severity
  • Hands you a ready patch snippet, not a vague suggestion
  • Stays to the point and won't rewrite code to personal taste
Sample dialogue

How Code Review works

Prompt
Review this Python function: it takes user_id straight from the request and drops it into a raw SQL string. What's wrong and how do I fix it?
C Code Review
CRITICAL — SQL injection (line 4)
user_id is dropped into the query via an f-string. Anyone can pass ' OR '1'='1 and read other people's data.

WHY
A request value reaches SQL without escaping — textbook OWASP A03 (Injection).

PATCH
cur.execute("SELECT * FROM orders WHERE user_id = %s", (user_id,))

ALSO
- Verify that user_id belongs to the current user, or you still have an IDOR.
- Wrap the cursor in a context manager so the connection is always closed.
Where it shines

Four scenarios where this assistant pays off

01
Pull request review
Read the diff before merge, tied to line numbers
02
Security issues
Injection, authorization and secrets per OWASP Top 10
03
Legacy audit
Understand unfamiliar code and surface hidden bugs
04
Onboarding
A second look at a junior's code with explanations
About assistant

More about Code Review

AI Code Review

The Code Review assistant on NetRoom takes a diff or a snippet and returns a structured report instead of a vague "looks fine". It cites the exact lines, explains the risk and hands you a patch snippet on the spot.

What it checks

First, critical bugs and security risks — injection, broken authorization, leaked secrets and the usual OWASP Top 10 issues. Then architecture and performance: redundant database calls, N+1 queries, leaky abstractions. Last, style and readability: naming, dead code, overlong functions. No filler, and no rewriting everything to personal taste.

What the output looks like

Every finding is tied to a line, tagged by severity and paired with a short "why this is a problem". Where it makes sense, you get a ready fix you can paste and test. That keeps the review fast and stops it turning into an argument about preferences.

When it helps

Before merging a pull request, when untangling someone's legacy, during a junior's onboarding, or as a second pair of eyes on a small team. Paste the diff into a chat on NetRoom and get the review in minutes instead of waiting a day for a reviewer.

Try Code Review
right now

Assistants are included with every NetRoom account. No card, no obligations.